Legal Review of Plagiarism of Youtube Content Carried Out by the Calon Sarjana Channel Against Youtuber Jamie Tate According to Law Number 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyright
Abstract
This research aims to find out the legal protection for Jamie Tate's Youtube video copyrighted work as a foreigner against acts of plagiarism committed by the Calon Sarjana’s channel as an Indonesian citizen according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and to find out the legal remedies that the creator can take for plagiarism . This research uses a type of Normative research, using two approaches, namely the legal approach (Statue Approach) and the conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach). The results of this research show that legal protection against copyright violations such as piracy of content or video content, rebroadcasting without the creator's permission, as well as plagiarism of content by both domestic and foreign individuals, so as to protect the rights of creators relating to their creations granted exclusive rights to the Creator. Meanwhile, if foreigners want to file a copyright lawsuit, they can do so at the Commercial Court as stated in Article 95 Paragraph (1) UUHC. It can be said that foreigners can sue Indonesian citizens who violate their copyright because Indonesia has ratified the Berne Convention through Presidential Decree 18/1997. So, in this case, Jamie Tate as the creator has the right to file a claim for compensation with the Commercial Court for the copyright infringement he experienced as stated in Article 99 Paragraph (1) UUHC. The legal action taken by Jamie Tate regarding acts of plagiarism carried out by the Calon Sarjana’s Youtube channel can be done in 3 ways, namely, through litigation by suing the Bachelor Candidate in the Commercial Court, through non-litigation through online mediation, and finally through YouTube's instrument is in the form of reporting copyright violations.
References
Ayu Indirakirana, Ni ketut Millenia Krisnayanie, “Upaya Perlindungan Hak Cipta Konten “Youtube WNA yang Dijiplak oleh WNI dalam Perspektif Bern Convention”, Ganesha Law Review, Volume 3 Issue 1 Mei 2021.
H. OK. Saidin, 2015, “Aspek Hukum Hak kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual property rights), PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2015.
Hari Syah Putra, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perbuatan Plagiarisme Pada Platform Youtube Ditinjau Menurut Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta”, Skripsi, Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri AR-RANIRY Banda Aceh.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Surabaya, 2015.
Naomy Soegianto, dkk., “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kebijakan Youtube Terbaru Tahun 2019 dalam Meminimalisir Adanya Plagiarisme Suatu Karya Hak Cipta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014”, Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 10 Nomor 3, Tahun 2021.
Ranti Fauza Mayana dan Tisni Santika, “Hak Cipta dalam konteks ekonomi kreatif dan transformasi digital”, cetakan kesatu, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung. 2022.
Shidarta, Plagiarisme dan Otoplagiarisme, Jurnal Komunikasi Universitass Tarumanagara, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011.
Sinurat Teddy Setiada dkk., “Perlindungan Hukum atas Pelanggaran Pembajakan Hak Cipta Video di Situs Youtuber”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Vol. 9, No. 2, Agustus (2020).
Tongkotow Liedfray dkk, “Peran Media Sosial Dalam Mempererat Interaksi Antar Keluarga Di Desa Esandom Kecamatan Tombatu Timur Kabupaten Minahasa Tenggara”, JURNAL ILMIAH SOCIETY, Volume 2 No. 1 Tahun 2022.
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Yusril Ramdhany
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
