PENERAPAN ASAS NASIONALITAS AKTIF TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG
Abstract
Money laundering crime is a follow-up crime which is forwarded from a predicate crime. In line with technological developments, the proceeds of criminal offenses that are laundered may also come from the proceeds of crimes committed outside the territory of Indonesia. Money Laundering Act stipulates that the predicate crime of money laundering committed outside the territory of Indonesia can be prosecuted and tried under Indonesian law as well as Indonesian citizens who are outside the territory of Indonesia who participate in conducting trials and assistance. or a malicious consensus to commit the crime of laundering. However, the application of Indonesian law to crimes committed in the territorial areas of other countries will relate to issues of law enforcement jurisdiction. This raises a problem regarding the extent to which the active nationality principle can apply to the perpetrators of the crime of money laundering whose predicate crime and crimes of probation, co-operation or conspiracy are committed outside the territory of Indonesia. The preparation of this paper uses a normative research method with a statutory approach. This paper concludes that the active nationality principle can be applied based on the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) letter z and Article 10 of the Money Laundering Act. The application of the active nationality principle cannot be carried out absolutely because there are limitations related to the sovereignty of the State where the criminal act is committed, the sovereignty of this country is closely related to the legal jurisdiction of a country. Therefore, to be able to apply Money Laundering Act in the jurisdiction of other countries, a legal basis is needed in the form of formal cooperation or mutual assistance. In addition, a technical extradition treaty is required to hand over the perpetrator of a criminal offense to the Indonesian state.
References
Ali, M. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Gernasih, Y. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Anti Pencucian Uang dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada
Istanto, F. G. (2007). Penelitian Hukum: Yogyakarta: CV Ganda
Marzuki, P.M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Renika Cipta
Parthiana, I.W. (2004). Hukum Pidana Internasional dan Ekstradisni. Bandung: CV. Yrama Widya
Salim, H.S. dan Nurbani, S. (2014). Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Soemitro, R.H. (1988). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
2. Jurnal
Ayumiati. (2012). Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) Dan Strategi Pemberantasan. Legatimasi Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum, 1(2), 76-86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v1i2.1428. h. 81.
Barus, Yan Jefri. (2014). Yurisdiksi Wilayah Udara Suatu Negara Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Sumatra Journal Of International Law, 2(1), h.4.
Husein, Yunus & Roberts K. (2018). Tipelogi dan Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, h. 14.
Kalalo, Flora Pricilla. (2016,). Efektivitas Perjanjian Ekstradisi Sebagai Sarana Pencegahan, Pemberantasan Dan Penghukuman Pelaku Tindak Pidana Internasional. Lex Et Societatis. 4(1), h. 8.
Pratiwi, Dian Khoreanita. (2017). Implementasi Yurisdiksi Negara Indonesia Dalam Pemberantasan Perompakan Dan Perampokan Laut Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional. Era Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 1-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/era%20hukum.v15i2.1070,h.5-6
Santoso, M. Iman. (2008). Kedaulatan Dan Yurisdiksi Negara Dalam Sudut Pandang Keimigrasian. Binamulia Hukum, 7(1), 1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v7i1.11, h. 2.
Situngkir, Danel Aditia. (2018). Eksistensi Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Penerapan Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 659-671. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v4i2.105, h.662-663.
3. Peraturan Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2010 Nomor 122, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5164.
Authors whose manuscript is published will approve the following provisions:
-
The right to publication of all journal material published on the AKTUAL JUSTICE journal website is held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain the property of the author).
-
The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, which means Jurnal of AKTUAL JUSTICE reserves the right to store, modify the format, administer in the database, maintain and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
-
Printed and electronically published manuscripts are open access for educational, research, and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
